Edmonton lawyer’s conduct led to interrupt down of Northlands case, court docket docket paperwork current

A multi-million buck wrongful dismissal and defamation trial collapsed because of the conduct of the lawyer representing former Edmonton Northlands cashiers, court docket docket paperwork current.

This week, CBC Data opposed an utility to utterly seal affidavits plaintiffs had filed about Glenda Pidde, who represented 19 fired Northlands parking suppliers cashiers for better than six years, and a publication ban on a mistrial utility.

“Most of the people has a correct to know regarding the causes for the results of the case,” talked about CBC lawyer Tess Layton all through oral arguments Wednesday.

Six sworn affidavits have been prepared. The plaintiffs’ new lawyer requested Courtroom of Queen’s Bench Justice Tom Rothwell to utterly seal the paperwork and to order a publication ban on their mistrial utility.

Arguing on behalf of the plaintiffs, lawyer Philip Prowse talked about the affidavits may embarrass Pidde. He described her conduct as “atrocious” and “nothing even close to expert.”

On Friday, Justice Rothwell decided in favor of the CBC, dismissing the plaintiff’s request for a publication ban and sealing order.

“Sustaining the open court docket docket principle would not pose a vital hazard to her privateness or endanger her bodily or psychological properly being,” Rothwell talked about.

No trial preparation

The plaintiffs claimed of their sworn affidavits that they’ve been in no way appropriately prepared for trial.

They described meeting with Pidde on March 6 on the Edmonton Inn. The lawyer demanded the group act as cheerleaders by repeatedly chanting, “We’re gonna win.”

On March 17, the group met on the Victoria golf course. Angela Pegg, in her affidavit, claimed the lawyer supplied no trial preparation.

“[Pidde] wished us to face in a circle around her whereas stomping our toes. She wished the plaintiffs to call her ‘The Frequent,'” Pegg talked about.

Plaintiff Janet Roberts claimed in her affidavit that Pidde “danced to music for lots of the meeting.”

Plaintiffs Ann Handfield and Janet Roberts, confirmed proper right here, filed affidavits about Pidde. (Peter Evans/CBC)

At 11:29 pm the evening time sooner than the trial began, Pidde despatched Pegg an e mail saying she was taking marijuana capsules and requested Pegg to current her a wake-up title the next morning.

Spherical midnight, Pidde despatched one different e mail, saying she had started ingesting wine.

“If I scent of alcohol or appear stoned, inform me. Carry gum or mouthwash in case you assume it will help,” she talked about.

On the first full day of the trial, Pidde made a wide-ranging opening assertion that included accusations that Northlands had destroyed proof, and lied to its employees and most of the people about what occurred.

The resolve persistently reminded her to take care of the lawyer representing Northlands with expert respect.

If I scent of alcohol or appear stoned, inform me.– Glenda Pidde in an e mail

After court docket docket ended for the day, Pegg drove Pidde dwelling.

She claimed Pidde requested to stop at a liquor retailer, the place she bought a bottle of wine, and a marijuana dispensary, the place she purchased 20 packs of edibles and three cans of marijuana-infused drinks.

Plaintiffs fed up with lawyer’s conduct

By Day 3 of the trial, the plaintiffs had had adequate.

Loads of them decided to jot down down a observe to the resolve, asking to speak to him about their lawyer’s conduct.

“Ms. Pidde did not have to converse to us and I did not know what to do,” Roberts talked about.

Afterward, outdoor the courtroom, Pidde tried intimidating her by twice bumping her chest into that of Roberts, she talked about.

“Ms. Pidde was erratic and offended,” Roberts talked about.

She talked about Pidde snatched the first observe Roberts tried at hand to the clerk and crumpled it up, nonetheless Roberts wrote one different observe that was handed alongside to the resolve.

In her affidavit, Pegg connected a duplicate of an e mail Pidde despatched her on March 31.

“I shall be asking the Justice to withdraw me as your counsel at 1:30…You can have injury me, abused and embarrassed me in a court docket docket of regulation. I am carried out,” Pidde talked about throughout the e mail.

When the resolve gave Pidde time to speak to her purchasers outdoor the courtroom, Roberts talked about Pidde instructed her purchasers to “F—okay off,” then entered the court docket docket and instructed Justice Rothwell that she wished off the case.

“Ms. Pidde quitting in the middle of trial made me actually really feel anxious, confused and scared. I did not know whether or not or not I, along with the alternative plaintiffs, could be given a great trial,” Roberts wrote.

Edmonton lawyer Glenda Pidde in an undated {{photograph}}. (411.ca)

After the trial collapsed, Pidde continued to ship Roberts “bizarre, racist, threatening textual content material messages.”

The Regulation Society of Alberta was unable to say if it has obtained any complaints about Pidde or if her conduct is being investigated.

Civil lawsuit now on keep

On Friday afternoon, the lawyer representing Northlands urged Justice Rothwell to declare an adjournment.

The plaintiffs’ lawyer wishes a mistrial and a model new resolve.

Rothwell talked about he’ll topic a written alternative, probably in July.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *